Waterfall VS Agile Methodology
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is a progression of stages that give a typical comprehension of the product building process. How we acknowledge the product that created from the business comprehension and necessities elicitation stage to change over these business thoughts and prerequisites into functions and features until its utilization and task to accomplish the business needs.
The software designer ought to have enough information on the most proficient method to pick the SDLC display in view of the venture setting and the business prerequisites.
The two most common SDLC methodologies used by companies are the traditional waterfall methodology or agile methodology. But the question is that …
which of these two methods is better for a successful project?
Well, each method has its pros and cons. Let’s have a quick glance on these two methodologies.
Waterfall model :
Waterfall model is also known as the linear sequential model. In this model, one stage falls under the following, and the following, until the point comes that a project comes to an end. We have a tendency to have an extremely long procedure to really deliver an item. We complete a considerable measure of plan and engineering work, thinking of the necessities and after that in the long run, once we affirm, we move into building the item. In any case, the client truly doesn’t get the opportunity to see the item until the point when it is “done” and the project finishes. Onwar from that point, if any changes need to be made, we have to build from the start.
Agile Model :
Agile Model is rapid development model. In this approach, the project divides into sprints. Each sprint has a characterized time with a running list of deliverables, arranged at the start of the sprint. Deliverables can be organize as dictate by the client. In the event, if there is some work left then reprioritize the work and data uses for some future sprint planning. The testing is done simultaneously to the development, unlike the waterfall model. It ’s an iterative team based approach.
After having a quick glance, you might have a clear idea of these two approaches. Now, you might be thinking that which approach to choose?
There are various advantages of agile over the waterfall :
- The major advantage of an agile approach is that it can easily adhere to customer’s needs and requirements. As projects are split into sprints, it can allow customers to give instant feedback. The product will made according to customer’s requirements.
- If the customer needs some changes to be made, then they will be easily made during the project lifecycle. The product or software doesn’t develop from scratch.
- It additionally is extremely helpful for the organizations that provide the team a chance to adjust workloads.
- Further, it is also great for evaluation. It involves regular stand-ups that ensure that the project is going well.
- As the testing and development go concurrently so the risk of bugs is quite low. The bugs will remove simultaneously and a quality product will deliver at the end.
- If the deadline is near or the product launch in the market early then it’s quite beneficial because we have the working software and beta version can be launch. We can add more functionalities later.
There are some limitations of an agile approach that it is not suitable for small projects and it involves a lot of customer feedback but above all, it’s quite a useful approach because it focuses on customer satisfaction.
Here, at Ashtex Solutions, we initially used a waterfall but have shifted to an agile methodology. As we want our clients to be happy and satisfied with us. We ensure our team performance by regular standups and stay in touch with our clients so that they may know about the progress of their project or product. Our end goal is customer satisfaction and a quality product.